Last week, AVweb asked its readers for opinions on the Age-60 Rule. A full
half of those who responded were in lock-step: You said that safe piloting
can only be determined on a case-by-case basis, and the Age-60 Rule does a
disservice to pilots of all ages. The other half of you were divided on
the effectiveness of the Age-60 Rule. 14% of you (72 voters) admitted that
Age-60 is unfair but conceded that the Rule is a practical way to keep unsafe
pilots on the ground. Another 14% said that a conservative age cap is the
cost of safety. Plus, votes were nearly equal for those in favor of self-certification (no medicals) and those who believe medicals are a must. But only 4% (22 voters) said that older pilots represent a
clear, immediate hazard.