You are viewing the printer-friendly version of this page.
Click here for the standard version.

AVweb's Question of the Week ...

February 24, 2005


*** PREVIOUS RESULTS ***

Last week, AVweb asked our readers to deliver a verdict on the Lycoming verdict.  Too much money awarded?  Too little?  Dangerous precedent?

The majority of respondents (52%) categorized their feelings on the Lycoming verdict as "complicated."  While the company needs to be financially stable, AVweb readers also felt that Lycoming should hold themselves to a high standard of quality in order to earn the financial stability on which the entire engine market rests.

21% of readers thought the verdict was "a good swift kick in the butt for Lycoming," while 11% thought the excessive judgement was a bad omen for everyone involved in aviation.

Among the less popular replies to last week's question:

  • 69 AVweb readers thought this was another instance of a non-aviation-savvy jury acting in ignorance.
  • 10 readers said this was clearly a mistake and that Lycoming will eventually be vindicated.
  • 3 readers said the verdict was unequivocally good for the industry.
  • And 26 of you were more worried about your Lycoming crankshafts breaking than the actual courtroom decision.

*** THIS WEEK'S QUESTION ***

Cue the X-Files theme music.  This week, an AVweb reader wants to know if you've ever seen a UFO — and if so, what did you think it was?

Click here to answer


Have an idea for a new QOTW? Send your suggestions to qotw@avweb.com.

NOTE:
This address is only for suggested QOTW questions, and not for QOTW answers or comments.
Use this form to send QOTW comments to our AVmail Editor.



Copyright Aviation Publishing Group. All rights reserved