Question of the Week: The FAA's Proposed Rules for the Hudson River Corridor

  • E-Mail this Article
  • View Printable Article
  • Text size:

    • A
    • A
    • A

This Week's Question | Previous Week's Answers

PREVIOUS RESULTS ***

Last week, we asked if more manufacturers should be granted the same latitude as Boeing to self-certify parts and processes or perhaps even wider powers of self-certification.

Judging by the response to last week's Question, reader opinions on this subject run the gamut. A narrow plurality of readers (33% of those who responded) said self-certification is acceptable for minor engineering and process changes, but anything more needs independent oversight. At the far end, only 7% of respondents said manufacturers shouldn't be able to move an inch without FAA approval, while 21% said the FAA is just in the way most of the time; manufacturers know their products better than anyone.

For a complete (real-time) breakdown of reader responses, click here.
(You may be asked to register and answer if you haven't already participated in this poll.)

THIS WEEK'S QUESTION ***

The FAA is proposing rules that would segregate Hudson Class B Exclusion Area traffic by altitude and mandate common safety practices already used by many pilots. We'd like to know what you think of them, particularly the Class B VFR designation that is being proposed.

Do you support the FAA's proposed Hudson Exclusion Area revisions?
(click to answer)


Have an idea for a new "Question of the Week"? Send your suggestions to .

NOTE:
This address is only for suggested "QOTW" questions, and not for "QOTW" answers or comments.
Use this form to send "QOTW" comments to our AVmail Editor.