Question of the Week: The agency insists that for drones to operate in the airspace the rest of us use for anything but hobbies, <a href="http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Report_FAABehindScheduleOnDroneIntegration_207367-1.html">they have to have onboard sense-and-avoid systems</a>. Is that reasonable?

Question of the Week

The agency insists that for drones to operate in the airspace the rest of us use for anything but hobbies, they have to have onboard sense-and-avoid systems. Is that reasonable?

Should drones be required to have onboard sense-and-avoid systems?

See-and-avoid hardly ever works for human pilots. Why make it a requirement for drones?

Drones are always under active control, and the ability of the operators to see and avoid from the remote sensors should be sufficient.

Onboard sense-and-avoid is a reasonable requirement, and we should get the integration of drones into the system right the first time.

I don't like the idea of pilotless airplanes in the airspace I use at all.

OTHER [My opinion doesn't appear as a choice — but maybe I'll send you an e-mail. (200 words or less, please.)]