HOME
REGISTER/LOGIN
FREE NEWSLETTER
XML|RSS
Advanced Search
PODCAST
VIDEO
AVMAIL

July 13, 2003

AVmail: July 14, 2003
July 13, 2003

by
Got Something to Say?

Send us an AVmail!

The views expressed in this section are strictly those of the contributors, and are not necessarily shared by AVweb, its staff or management.

NOTE: If we select your email for publication, we reserve the right to edit it for length and to excise language we deem offensive. We do not publish unsigned emails, but we will withhold your name if you specifically ask us to.

Previous AVmail is available here.


Boeing Looks To The ATC Market ... But Can The NAS Be Fixed?

Your story this morning shows an aerial photograph of Halifax airport. No mention is made of the photo, and its relevance to the story is not clear.

Did you know that this is Halifax International Airport (CYHZ) in Nova Scotia, Canada? It was taken immediately after 9/11, when most transatlantic airliners were diverted to airports in the Canadian Maritimes.

Hugh Morrin
Transport Canada Flight Test

AVweb Responds:

For all the criticism of the NAS (noted in text adjacent to the image), that picture seemed representative of one day the system worked extremely well (while some might argue the contrary), and in one frame also conveys the complexity of the task.

I hope that explains its relevance.

Glenn Pew
Editor


The Plane Crazy Days of Summer

It is not fair to show a duck hunter as the possible symbol of the person that shot at plane. First, a good hunter knows at what distance he can effectively bring down a bird. Second, duck hunters know the laws and bag limits, and I dont think that it is Cessna season.

Pete Aasen


Avjet Settles For $11.7 Million

Regarding your article on the Avjet judgment for 11.7 mega-bucks. The plaintiffs' attorney said, "If their deaths are to have any meaning, it is our hope that today's resolution will send a clear message to pilots and private air charter companies everywhere to obey the air safety rules and regulations intended for the public's protection."

I have no opinion on whether the plaintiffs deserve or do not deserve the judgment, but the use of that statement is outrageous! Pilot's don't need a court judgment -- where a bunch of money changed hands -- to send a clear message to obey rules, regs, etc. The simple fact that that these pilots crashed and ended the lives of their passengers and themselves, combined with the NTSB findings, do that more than adequately.

My condolences to the family and friends of those lost on N303GA. It is truly sad.

Chris Claborne

JavaScript Menus and DHTML Menus Powered by Milonic

Copyright Aviation Publishing Group. All rights reserved | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Contact Us | XMLRSS | Site Map | Top