September 6, 1999 The Pilot's Lounge #13: An Instructor's Obligation |
|
Flight instructors have the unique obligation both to teach students the skills for safe aircraft operation and to critique them when those skills need work. Too frequently, a student proves incapable of accepting criticism and goes off on his own, until the inevitable crash. AVweb's Rick Durden has a special nook of memories for two such students. It's a place you should know about — one with too many residents already.
September 6, 1999
 |
 |
 |
| About the Author ... |
|
Rick Durden is a
practicing aviation attorney who holds an ATP Certificate, with a type rating
in the Cessna Citation, and Commercial privileges for gliders, free balloons
and single-engine seaplanes. He is also an instrument and multi-engine flight
instructor. Rick started flying when he was fifteen and became a flight
instructor during his freshman year of college.
He did a little of everything
in aviation to help pay for college and law school including flight
instruction, aerial application, and hauling freight. In the process of trying
to fly every old and interesting airplane he could, Rick has accumulated over
5,400 hours of flying time. In his law practice, Rick regularly represents
pilots, fixed base operators, overhaulers, and manufacturers. Prior to
starting his private practice, he was an attorney for Cessna in Wichita for
seven years.
He is a regular contributor to Aviation Consumer and AOPA Pilot
and teaches aerobatics in a 7KCAB Citabria in his spare time. Rick makes it
clear he is part owner of a corporation which owns a Piper Aztec because,
having flown virtually every type of piston-engine airplane Cessna
manufactured from 1933 on, as well as all the turboprops and some of the jets,
he cannot bring himself to admit to actually owning a Piper.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
It's
late at night in the pilot's lounge. Outside the windows, the pilot-activated
runway and taxi lights are dark, silently awaiting the next airplane although
a propeller hasn't turned in several hours. Everyone left quite a while ago;
some inquired as to whether I was going, and accepted my "a bit later"
before becoming receding taillights. There is but one light, burning low, here
in the Lounge. I've been to visit that little room where I put the memories of
friends and acquaintances now dead. (It's a blunt, hard, cold word. We won't use
euphemisms; they are dead.) There is a special corner in that room for those,
fortunately few, who have died in airplanes. In that corner, there is a dark
nook for two special pilots. They are special because I was certain they were
going to kill themselves in airplanes and, even though I was a flight
instructor, I either didn't or couldn't do anything about it. Despite the fact
it has been over a year since the second one died, it is still a painful journey
to go into that nook, because I cannot help but have the nagging feeling that I
could have done more to prevent their deaths. I know the journey is one that
more than a few experienced flight instructors take from time to time, usually
only very late at night, and when they are alone. They agonize over what more
they could have done to prevent a death.
They are the instructors who have a little deeper lines in their faces and
who become very quiet from time to time.
Tonight I made my journey because I just tried to prevent a third pilot from
joining the other two. I think I have probably lost a friend. I don't know if I
made a difference. I don't know if I was too insistent, or vociferous. I don't
know if his ego simply prevented him from listening. But I tried and he got
angry and I couldn't get past his anger and his ego to get him to take a look at
himself and the way he flies.
The Far Side Of The Line
There are certain things we learn as we spend more and more time around
airplanes, particularly if we teach people to fly those airplanes and if we
associate with others who teach the lore of flight. One of those truths is that
a flight instructor who has been instructing for more than about 400 hours and
is worth his or her salt can evaluate a pilot by the time that pilot has gotten
into the airplane and fastened the seat belt and shoulder harness. Perhaps it
sounds crass to tell pilots that the instructor they just met is evaluating them
from the beginning, but it's true. That skill has kept some instructors alive
because they knew this new person was going to be trouble and they were ready
for it. Flight instructors develop this ability. I have almost never seen it in
other pilots, no matter what other ratings they posses. Flight instructors can
tell quickly who is a good pilot, who isn't, who is good but merely rusty and
who is very good. In their profession, they consciously or unconsciously place
pilots on a spectrum of performance, skill and judgment.
Most all instructors also have a line, way over to one side of their pilot
spectrum. There are only a very few pilots on the far side of that line, and
they have not been put there lightly. For on the other side of that line are
those that instructor firmly believes are going to kill themselves in an
aircraft.
A Tale Of Two Pilots
I had never put anyone on the far side of the line until I had well over
1,000 hours of teaching people about little airplanes. I had come to know a man
about my age, who had been a professional pilot, but who was working in an office
and flying for business and pleasure. We hit it off. We frequently got together
to talk flying. Our families socialized together. I learned that he had a very
large ego; however, it did not adversely affect our friendship. We did not
happen to fly together until I had known him for a couple of years. When we did
fly he took the left seat and I the right. On a predawn takeoff into a low
ceiling and fog, he made a serious error, which very nearly killed us. I let
things progress a long way before taking any action, being surprised that my
friend could be descending rather than climbing, in fog, doing nothing about it
and, apparently, not even recognizing that something was amiss. When the
situation approached being grave, I spoke up. He did not respond or react. I
spoke up again, suggesting he establish a positive rate of climb. Then I reached
for the yoke. Before I physically touched it, he lashed out verbally and
finally, within a few feet of the ground, began to climb. While back in the '50s
Lenny Bruce said no one is shocked anymore, I found that I was an exception. My
friend's actions with the airplane and response to a suggestion that he climb
were so inappropriate as to be unbelievable. As we climbed out, he chewed me out
for daring to speak to him about the way the airplane was flown.
The balance of the trip I sat and watched as he proved unable to fly the
airplane with any degree of accuracy and finally made a landing that was at the
edge of my personal willingness to keep my hands off the controls. Yet he seemed
pleased with his performance and again chastised me for being a chicken after
takeoff.
I did not ever fly with him again. I purposefully avoided it, as I had never
met anyone with the ratings he had that was quite that bad in an airplane and
unable to evaluate his own performance.
We did continue to socialize frequently. Some time later he indicated he was
considering a job offer in which he would go back to flying professionally. My
initial reaction was that he wouldn't make it a year; he'd kill himself in an
airplane. Because of his ego and my lack of experience, I never confronted him
about the problems I had observed. Instead, I made an argument against going
with the company he was considering because of its shaky financial position.
He lasted about three months. I got a call from his former secretary telling
me he had died in an accident. Fortunately, he was alone in the airplane.
I made a promise to myself that if I ever met another pilot who crossed or
was close to my personal line, I would confront him on the issue.
Three years ago I realized that a pilot I knew as a friend, but had never
flown with, was across my line. He took and spoke openly of insane risks. Of
flying when extremely tired, of shooting repeated instrument approaches to
airports reported to be below minimums until he got in, of making repairs and
modifications to his airplane despite not being a mechanic nor an engineer. For
the next two years we spoke and exchanged emails on a number of subjects. I
raised my concerns with his behavior. He did not laugh them off, but explained
because of the depth of his experience, he knew what he was doing. He could work
all day, get to the airport and discover the alternator on the airplane was
malfunctioning, remove it, take it apart, repair and reinstall it over the next
seven hours, then make a four-hour flight, arriving at his destination at dawn
because he was used to doing it. He disagreed politely with me and brushed off
my comments. I never stopped pushing it but I also never confronted him
directly.
He did not complete one of his late night flights.
First Time, Last Time?
Today I flew with a friend of mine for the first time. He wanted some review
of instrument procedures and insisted he didn't need a competency check because
he was current.
When I give a review to a pilot I have a procedure that I follow at the end
of the lesson. The pilot and I separate before we debrief. We each write an
evaluation of the flight and then get together and compare them. I feel it helps
the pilot learn to evaluate his or her skill and judgment, something that is
important in making the go/no-go decision when the weather or equipment is
questionable. Normally the evaluations track pretty closely. If they don't, it's
a red flag to me that something is wrong.
I had been more than a little uncomfortable with some things my friend had
said and done in the airplane and the cavalier attitude he had toward what I
considered to be safety of flight items. This was the first time I'd felt that
way about a pilot's performance in many years.
When we got back together he said that I probably couldn't find much to write
because he was so good. I looked to see if he were joking. He wasn't. He had
written less than half a page. I wrote four pages. As we talked he got more and
more upset. His ego wouldn't let him hear a comment that was less than a glowing
reflection of his abilities. I felt his method of operating the airplane
combined with his judgment placed him very near my personal line (although I did
not put him across it, he was very close). I confronted him on his actions and
behavior. He didn't like it. He finally stomped out of the office and left skid
marks across the parking lot.
I probably just lost a friend. I am, of course, concerned that I did not read
the situation correctly and overreacted. However, because two friends of mine
are no longer making logbook entries due to the fact they were accidents waiting
to happen and I felt I should have done more, I would not have done anything
differently today. I hope my friend listens. He is very smart, he just has the
emotional development of a three-year-old. Perhaps he will reflect on what we
talked about. Maybe he will simply remember the situation as one where the idiot
CFI had the gall to disagree and wouldn't back down when told the truth. I don't
know. I hope I was professional in the way I dealt with the problems I saw
because if there is any way he will listen, it will be because I did not raise
my voice, insult his intelligence or argue with him. I hope he thinks about what
happened and we can make some progress.
Right now I am not very optimistic. I feel awful. The beer I went out and
bought is sitting on the floor getting warm. I haven't been able to drink it. It
doesn't taste good.
An Instructor's Obligation
Over the years I have come to believe firmly that flight instructors have a
duty to aviation. On those rare times that the experienced instructor gets to
know or flies with someone who is close to that instructor's personal line on
the pilot spectrum, I believe the instructor has an obligation to raise the
issue with the pilot. We instructors may lose a friend or two. We may upset a
pilot or four, but to not step up and try to reach the person is to shirk the
responsibility we instructors so clearly have.
I do not feel that pilots who are not instructors have such a responsibility.
There are pilots who, despite being well meaning, do not have the training or
experience to evaluate another pilot's behavior. Their input is too often merely
meddling, for too frequently they are the ones who need guidance rather than
offering it. So, I feel this obligation lies with flight instructors, and it
cannot be taken lightly. It can also be very painful to confront a friend or
colleague.
Sometimes instruction is not fun. At those times the measly $40 per hour I
charge isn't even close to being enough.
I'm not going home yet.
I just hope I will not be putting a third friend in that little nook in that
room in the back of my mind.
See you next month.
|