Air Charter Association To Mark ‘Fly Legal Day’ On January 21


This Saturday (Jan. 21) marks the fourth anniversary of the 2019 crash of a Piper Malibu in the English Channel, claiming the life of the pilot and Argentinian soccer star Emiliano Sala. The flight from Nantes, France, bound for Cardiff City, U.K., was ultimately adjudged to be an illegal charter flight, sometimes referred to as “gray charter”—a flight flown for compensation, but not flown to commercial operational standards (FAR Part 135 in the U.S.); rather, under the equivalent of U.S. FAR Part 91 rules for private flying.

The tragedy stands as a landmark for the international industry advocacy group the Air Charter Association (ACA). As such, the ACA sets January 21 as “Fly Legal Day.”

On its website entry for Fly Legal Day, ACA explains, “Legitimate, licensed, regulated and fully legal commercial operators and pilots spend huge amounts of time and financial resources to minimize the risk involved in every commercial flight. They are also subject to rigorous safety oversight by national authorities. They must adhere to a strict set of regulations including specific standards for aircraft maintenance, flight operations, ground operations, crew experience, training, and increased insurance, all of which protect the safety of passengers and crew.

“This level of oversight and safety management simply does not exist with private flights and this is why the distinction between private flights and commercial operations exists—to protect fare-paying passengers who expect the highest standards.”

The ACA asks all its members to show support on Jan. 21 on social media to “help travelers recognize the dangers.” ACA writes: “We are asking all our members and industry colleagues around the world to unite in spreading the word and to shine a light on this illicit practice with the hope of preventing any future tragedy.”

Avatar photo
Mark Phelps is a senior editor at AVweb. He is an instrument rated private pilot and former owner of a Grumman American AA1B and a V-tail Bonanza.

Other AVwebflash Articles


  1. Interesting. One has to wonder if the deceased actually did “expect the highest standards”. Or, if they were looking for something else which was made even less safe by prohibition.

    I just hate the self serving rhetorical games played by all these institutions. We’ve somehow regulated our way into a situation where “safe” now means a new piston single is a ridiculously priced antique machine.

  2. I’d like to see a comparison on the relative safety of corporate operations (flown by dedicated crews) compared to charter operations.

    Charter is highly regulated–corporate far less so. The costs of complying with outdated charter regulations discourages aircraft owners from placing their aircraft on charter certificates–which hurts the industry.

    I believe that statistics would show that corporate operators have a record equal to or better than charter operators.

    As an FBO, we USED to do charters–but gave it up as unprofitable. Today, we simply crew owner airplanes. It is a horrible indictment of the over-regulation of the industry when we have PAID FOR airplanes and associated costs–and the cost of regulation is so high that owners and operators choose to simply NOT put their aircraft on charter.

    Regulatory advocates have achieved their goals–I guess that if NOBODY FLIES, the safety record is PERFECT!