FAA Shields Voluntary Safety Reports

New order protects certain safety information shared by industry groups to encourage voluntary reporting.

FAA Shields Voluntary Safety Reports
[Credit: Iljanaresvara Studio | Shutterstock]
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • The FAA has finalized an order protecting voluntarily submitted aviation safety information, shared through the U.S. Aviation Safety Team (USAST) and its partners, from public disclosure.
  • This order covers various data, including safety reports and risk assessments, aiming to encourage the aviation industry to share sensitive information to proactively identify and prevent incidents.
  • While generally protected indefinitely, the order excludes information related to possible criminal activity, intentional falsification, or reckless conduct, and permits the release of de-identified or aggregated safety findings.
See a mistake? Contact us.

The FAA finalized an order Wednesday protecting certain voluntarily submitted aviation safety information from being publicly disclosed. The order, published Wednesday in the Federal Register, covers information provided through the U.S. Aviation Safety Team (USAST), a government-industry partnership that identifies safety risks across the National Airspace System. The designation follows a proposal issued in August 2025.

Information Covered

The protections extend to safety reports, risk assessments, meeting records and information about the implementation of recommended safety improvements. The USAST brings together aviation organizations and existing safety groups, including the General Aviation Joint Safety Committee, Commercial Aviation Safety Team, U.S. Helicopter Safety Team and Drone Safety Team. Information voluntarily submitted by non-FAA participants will generally be exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.

“This offers the FAA a unique opportunity to work with the aviation industry to avoid incidents or accidents,” the agency stated in its notice.

The FAA said participants could be reluctant to share sensitive safety information if it might later become publicly available, limiting the agency’s ability to identify emerging hazards.

Limits on Disclosure Protections

Under the order, qualifying information may remain protected indefinitely. Still, the designation nonetheless excludes information involving possible criminal activity, intentional falsification, reckless conduct, substance abuse and certain other misconduct. The FAA may also release de-identified or aggregated information to explain regulatory changes or communicate safety findings to the aviation community.

The order applies more specifically to information shared through the USAST and its affiliated safety groups. It does not replace any other existing voluntary reporting system, including NASA’s Aviation Safety Reporting System.

Matt Ryan

Matt is AVweb's lead editor. His eyes have been turned to the sky for as long as he can remember. Now a fixed-wing pilot, instructor and aviation writer, Matt also leads and teaches a high school aviation program in the Dallas area. Beyond his lifelong obsession with aviation, Matt loves to travel and has lived in Greece, Czechia and Germany for studies and for work.

Continue discussion - Visit the forum

Replies: 3

  1. I don’t see what is new here. This is only an order saying, obey 14 CFR 193, which has been around for over a decade. If we really want to improve safety and open up safety data for sharing, Congress need to pass a law (for all industries) that safety data is protected from litigation so long as a company performs due diligence on the hazards identified in the data to reduce risk. If a company sits on data and does not assess its risk or mitigate unacceptable risk, then the information can be used in a court of law.

  2. There is a law to prevent public disclosure of cockpit voice recordings that go to the NTSB. Somehow a court ordered disclosure anyway of the recordings of the Lexington KY crash where the plane departed on the wrong runway, even though those were supposed to be for NTSB use only. Any law requiring confidentiality can be worked around by judges. People won’t disclose safety issues if they think they will be dragged into a lawsuit, just like companies not making improvements if it exposes them to liability lawsuits.

  3. Avatar for MoMule MoMule says:

    “Still, the designation nonetheless excludes information involving possible criminal activity, intentional falsification, reckless conduct, substance abuse and certain other misconduct.”

    The ASAP program also has what is known internally, in the Voluntary Safety Program, as the “Big 5” exclusions for not accepting a report.

    Airmen should be entitled to anonymity to encourage reporting of safety issues. All other’s, such as VDRP and USAST, dilute the safety risk management principles.

Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE