FAA Proposes $3.7 Million Fine Against NavWorx

  • E-Mail this Article
  • View Printable Article
  • Text size:

    • A
    • A
    • A

The FAA wants to fine the now-shuttered NavWorx $3.7 million for allegedly altering its ADS-B transmitters to hide the fact that they used a non-compliant GPS chip. The agency says in a news release that NavWorx knew the chip didn’t meet standards tightened in 2015 for system integrity level (SIL) and rather than use a conforming chip the company changed some software in the ADS-600B units to emit a code that falsely indicated the chip met the standard. The FAA says the company advertised and sold the devices as being compliant with the 2020 ADS-B mandate when the substandard chip made the transmitters ineligible. Last week the company abruptly closed its doors and seemed to try to shift responsibility to the company that makes the GPS chip.

“Although the vendor represented their GPS module met 14 CFR 91.227, the FAA recently determined the GPS module does not meet 14 CFR 91.227,” NavWorx says on a single placeholder page put up in place of its website. All former contact emails and phone numbers AVweb has used in its extensive coverage of the NavWorx issues are now out of service and we were unable to reach anyone at the company. The FAA says it has been in contact with NavWorx since proposing the fine. In the news release, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said the agency must vigorously enforce its technical standards for crucial equipment like ADS-B. “The FAA has strict requirements for navigation units to ensure the reliability of the information they provide both to pilots and to air traffic controllers,” said Huerta. “Customers of these products must be able to trust that their equipment meets our safety standards."

Comments (5)

Finally. Finally. Finally. Action taken against the business practices of bill moffitt. Thank god. Good for the faa. False advertizing. Maybe the faa will give us a refund for our affected units. Its actually a very sad case. All bill had to do is play by the rules, source a compliant chip, and move forward. Nobody to blame but himself. Wow what a bad businessman. Then trying to bet the future of his company on a third party vendor. After all thats gone on. Why would you take this risk?

Michael radtke

Posted by: Michael Radtke | October 29, 2017 10:52 PM    Report this comment

As always - government making sure to get their fines levied and slow if any recovery for victims!

Posted by: Don Lineback | October 30, 2017 7:11 AM    Report this comment

That's nice that the government feels it should be the beneficiary of any penalties extracted. What about all of the people that bought the faulty products?

I guess it doesn't matter; Navworx will declare bankruptcy and nobody will see a dime.

Posted by: Robert Gatlin-Martin | October 31, 2017 5:32 AM    Report this comment

The FAA is the one who should be fined for changing the specification in midstream.

Posted by: ALLAN KROSNER | November 1, 2017 4:08 PM    Report this comment

They are out of business; what jobs were there are gone the money is gone, no pay checks to feed families and kids. Vendors are probably unpaid and someone's dream of a bright future is gone. I see nothing good in the FAA kicking a dead horse.

Posted by: bruce postlethwait | November 2, 2017 7:28 PM    Report this comment

Add your comments

Log In

You must be logged in to comment

Forgot password?


Enter your information below to begin your FREE registration