Canada Recommends Mandatory Flight Recorders For Commercial And Private Business Aircraft

  • E-Mail this Article
  • View Printable Article
  • Text size:

    • A
    • A
    • A

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) is recommending mandatory installation of lightweight flight recording systems by all commercial and private business operators not currently required to carry them. The TSB is also concerned with Transport Canada's reactive approach to oversight of private business aircraft operations. The details are in the investigation report (A16P0186) released this week into the 2016 fatal loss of control and collision with terrain of a Cessna Citation 500 near Kelowna, British Columbia.

In October of 2016, a Cessna Citation 500 that was privately operated by Norjet Inc. departed Kelowna Airport, British Columbia, on a night IFR flight to Calgary/Springbank Airport, Alberta. The pilot and three passengers were on board. Shortly after departure, the aircraft departed controlled flight, entering a steep descending turn to the right until it struck the ground. No emergency call was made. All of the occupants were fatally injured. Impact forces and a post-impact fire destroyed the aircraft.

Because there were no flight recording systems on board the aircraft, the TSB could not determine the cause of the accident. The most plausible scenario is that the pilot, who was likely dealing with a high workload associated with flying the aircraft alone, experienced spatial disorientation and departed from controlled flight shortly after takeoff. The investigation also determined that the pilot did not have the recent night flying experience required by Transport Canada for carrying passengers at night. Pilots without sufficient recent experience flying at night or by instruments are at a greater risk of loss of control accidents.

"We don't like having to say, 'We don't know,' when asked what caused an accident and why," said Kathy Fox, chair of the TSB. "We want to be able to provide definitive answers—to the victims' families, to Canada's aviation industry, to the Canadian public. This is why we are calling today for the mandatory installation of lightweight flight recording systems on commercial and private business aircraft not currently required to carry them."

The Board also raised a concern with the way Transport Canada (TC) had conducted oversight of private business aviation in Canada. During the course of its investigation, the TSB found no record that the operator of this aircraft had ever been inspected by TC. As such, TC was unaware of safety deficiencies in its flight operations, such as the failure to obtain approval for single-pilot operation of the aircraft and the pilot's lack of recent night flying experience required to carry passengers at night. Since this occurrence, TC has said that it will conduct targeted inspections of private business operators starting in April 2018. The Board says it will continue to monitor this safety issue.

Comments (3)

"...recommending mandatory installation..."
My Spidey sense tingles anytime that I see the words "recommending" and "mandatory" in the same sentence - as does my appreciation of irony.

Posted by: YARS (Tom Yarsley) | April 29, 2018 4:55 AM    Report this comment

ooops! a pilot not capable of carrying out the mission for lack of experience and / or training?

Ya know, as long as we have incidents of personal irresponsibility, we are going to have "the parents" saying, "No John. You cannot do X, Y, or Z."

Want less government oversight? Act responsibly.
"Aw gee, mom do I hafta?"

Posted by: Richard Katz | April 29, 2018 9:05 AM    Report this comment

Government always legislates to the lowest common denominator and assumes that people will not act responsibly. This accident is probably a case in point to justify that approach. My tingly sense arises when I see the words "lightweight flight recording systems". What exactly does that mean? A cockpit voice recording system could be relatively inexpensive and easy to install, but a full flight data recorder (FDR) could be both expensive to purchase and difficult to install. And, with a private aircraft, who owns the data? Yes, this applies to commercially operated aircraft, but still may be privately owned or maintained. The legal issues for the data could be quite thorny if it is requested for non-accident "incidents" like the Air Canada near miss at SFO last year. I know this is not in the American Justice system, but seems there are lots of legal issues to be addressed too.

Posted by: John McNamee | April 29, 2018 12:14 PM    Report this comment

Add your comments

Log In

You must be logged in to comment

Forgot password?


Enter your information below to begin your FREE registration