SMO Reopens With Shorter Runway

  • E-Mail this Article
  • View Printable Article
  • Text size:

    • A
    • A
    • A

Santa Monica Airport has reopened after a 10-day closure, with its sole runway shortened to 3,500 feet, a loss of 1,500 feet. The change is the latest effort by the city to reduce traffic at the urban airport, an effort that has long been opposed by the aviation community. “This is a great day for the City of Santa Monica and our residents,” said Ted Winterer, the city’s mayor. “We stayed the course and kept our eye on delivering a shortened runway just in time to usher in the New Year with reduced noise and pollution from large jets.” NBAA says the shorter runway will make it harder for pilots to comply with the city’s noise ordinances.

Aircraft departing the shortened runway will start their takeoff roll about 735 feet closer to the noise monitors at either end, NBAA says. Also, aircraft flying standard departures will pass over the noise monitors at lower altitudes than before. These changes could result in measured noise levels that exceed the city’s 95-decibel limit, even for aircraft that previously flew within the limits. Violators are subject to penalties ranging from a fine of $2,000 to suspension or exclusion, NBAA says. "NBAA is continuing its fight against curtailing access to SMO by challenging in court the settlement agreement between the FAA and the city that allows the runway shortening,” said Alex Gertsen, NBAA’s director of airports. “Should we prevail, this runway reduction will be temporary.”

Comments (5)

My hope is that now after snipping off some of the runway, them Leftists will find something else to cackle about and leave the airport and aviators be.

Posted by: Max Mason | December 28, 2017 7:10 PM    Report this comment

Maybe Santa Monica can open a high speed rail system similar to the one in Washington...

Posted by: J Walker | December 28, 2017 7:56 PM    Report this comment

'Leftists'? What has that to do with anything?

Posted by: Harry Saddler | December 28, 2017 10:58 PM    Report this comment

I don't care if it's there or not. I don't have a home in Brentwood nor do I have a personal jet. If the community there does not want it then it needs to go. The only irony is that it will increase local pollution and congestion when they make it all into a business park.

Posted by: Mark Fraser | December 29, 2017 9:39 AM    Report this comment

Mark, your comments go to the heart of the matter - people "don't care" if an issue doesn't effect them personally, right this instant. There is no thought given to the future (or to the past for that matter). This is the fatal flaw in character we see everywhere we go these days that without doubt will be this nation's undoing.

Posted by: Ken Keen | January 2, 2018 8:07 AM    Report this comment

Add your comments

Log In

You must be logged in to comment

Forgot password?


Enter your information below to begin your FREE registration