At AirVenture, Jeppesen has introduced a new app that runs a little against the trend in app development in general and frankly, Im happy to see it. As described in this video, the app is called Mobile FliteDeck VFR and its aimed specifically at VFR-only pilots. And given the way flying habits may be changing-less use of small personal airplanes for business flying and more recreational flying-Jeppesen may be on to something.
The app market is intensely competitive with revisions to the major products arriving every couple of months, if not faster. The competitive thrust seems to be ever more features and gadgets related to performing tasks that pilots may or may not have thought they needed. This gives some apps a layered complexity thats anything but simple in an industry that has plainly recognized (and stated) that its time for simpler, cheaper products across the board.
So Jeppesens Mobile FliteDeck VFR is clearly intended to break through the noise and offer a VFR-only pilot whos not interested in and doesnt need the higher level functions required for IFR a more accessible and easy-to-use option to get from A to B. Its full featured enough, but not so festooned with options as to be much of a training challenge to learn.
Its interesting that such a product would come from Jeppesen, a company thats owned by Boeing and which made its chops on building a worldwide network to collect data for the airline industry which is, by definition and regulation, IFR. Im more than a little surprised that one of the other app makers didnt come up with this idea.
On the other hand, none of the other app providers have access to Jeppesens excellent VFR charts. In 2009, as an alternative to the FAAs sectional charts, Jeppesen developed its own visual charts and they are, quite simply, better. Theyre less cluttered, use color more effectively and display more useful data. In Mobile FliteDeck VFR, Jeppesen has done something else weve been carping about for years: theyre using a database to render the charts on the tablet rather than using scans or PDFs. This makes for a sharper, crisper chart and usually a faster refresh.
It also portends a recasting of the basic instrument approach plate thats better suited for cockpit displays than is the traditional paper approach chart which, for years, has simply been rendered on whatever cockpit display has been available. In other words, we may be on the cusp of the data shaping the display rather than the display accommodating the ancient and fading notion of the paper chart.
If thats progress, Im liking what I see.
Join the conversation. Read others’ comments and add your own.
