Forward This E-mail | Edit Email Preferences | Advertise | Contact | Privacy | Help

  • Text size:

    • A
    • A
    • A

The wishes of ForeFlight users eager to use Jeppesen departure, arrival and approach plates have come true. The partnership between ForeFlight and the famed navigation data publisher was announced in early May, but access to the instrument plates only became available to ForeFlight users Wednesday. The upgrade to Jeppesen charts covering the continental U.S. plus Hawaii is $199 per year, not including the base cost of a ForeFlight subscription. Canada and Alaska (combined) are available for $179 per year. Jeppesen IFR en route charts, while included with the subscription to Jeppesen plates, won’t be available to users until later this summer, says ForeFlight.

“We’re thrilled about our partnership with Jeppesen and finally being able to deliver their best-in-class charts to our customers,” said Tyson Weihs, co-founder and CEO of ForeFlight. “This integration offers aviators the most powerful combination of Jeppesen charts and EFB functionality available on the market today.” Global terrain and obstacle data used to drive Hazard Advisor, Terrain Profile View and Synthetic Vision in ForeFlight is also provided by Jeppesen and comes included with ForeFlight Pro Plus or Performance Plus subscriptions.

Garmin 'Webinar July 18th - Exciting New Product Announcement'

The first Pilatus PC-24 destined for customer use crossed a major milestone on Wednesday when the wings and fuselage were “married” and the airframe was lowered onto its landing gear at the Pilatus headquarters in Stans, Switzerland. André Zimmermann, VP in charge of the PC-24 at Pilatus, told media representatives, “I am extremely pleased that today we successfully completed the fuselage to wing marriage of the first PC-24 for customer delivery. This is another very important and significant milestone in the PC-24's development program. We are now looking forward with great anticipation and tremendous pride to the very first customer handover later this year when PlaneSense will take delivery of their PC-24 and we witness the entry into service of our Super Versatile Jet.” PlaneSense is currently one of the largest operators of popular Pilatus PC-12 single-engine turboprops, with a fleet of 34 airplanes, and has committed to buying six PC-24s.

The PC-24 will be Pilatus’ first foray into jet aircraft. The Swiss manufacturer has been touting the ability of the new 17,000-pound twin-jet, equipped with a cargo door, to fly in and out of short, unpaved runways—places most operators are loath to take their current jets—with large or awkwardly shaped cargo. Pilatus advertises a takeoff balanced field length of 2,690 feet, driven largely by its 81-knot stall speed. The similarly sized Cessna Citation CJ4’s advertised takeoff field length is 3,410. For users less concerned with takeoff distance and need for a cargo door, the CJ4 does offer somewhat better range and top speed. Certification is expected by the end of 2017.

Continental 'Factory new CM Magnetos at near-rebuilt pricing'

This year’s edition of EAA AirVenture returns to Oshkosh, Wisconsin, in just over a week, promising a diverse and unique experience celebrating everything that flies, from hot-air balloons to classic warbirds to spaceships. A first at the show this year will be the appearance of the Blue Origin commercial space company, with its New Shepard rocket and a 1:1 mockup of its astronaut crew capsule. Also returning to the show in force, after several years’ absence, will be Scaled Composites, flying the Proteus aircraft and taking over a forum building for the whole week, offering 40 sessions on topics from fabrication to maintenance to test-flying your homebuilt.

Fans of warbirds will have plenty to see, with a highlight the first public flight of Doc and Fifi, marking the first time two B-29s have taken to the sky together in decades. The Blue Angels will perform, and a number of events will commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Apollo program. The show runs Monday, July 24, to Sunday, July 30. AVweb staff will be on site filing daily updates to your inbox, plus videos, podcasts and social media updates.

Can wi-fi make you a smarter pilot?

Bob Withrow, VP of Engineering at Scaled Composites, in Mojave, California, says the company will offer 40 forums during EAA AirVenture on all aspects of homebuilding, plus insights into the company's unique aircraft designs. 

PS Engineering 'Your alternative to Garmin

A 57-year-old tourist from New Zealand was killed earlier this week when she was knocked off her feet and into a retaining wall while watching jets depart from the St. Maarten Airport. Even if the name is unfamiliar, most pilots are familiar with pictures of baby-blue KLM 747s flying low over the heads of tourists on a narrow, white sand beach. The proximity to landing and departing aircraft has made the narrow stretch of Maho Beach a global tourist attraction, but one not entirely free of risk.

Most visitors watch the jets taking off and landing for the sheer joy of being sandblasted by high-bypass turbofans, which has proven to be fairly safe. Local tourism official Rolando Brinson says fewer than 10 people have been hospitalized from jet blast injuries in the 50 years the airport has been in operation. The woman killed this week was said to have been hanging onto the airport fence across the road from the beach. Although this marks the first fatality at the spot, in 2014 a woman was seriously injured when she let go of the same fence and tumbled head first into a retaining wall. That incident was captured on video and later shared on YouTube.

Sponsor Announcement
Safelog — The Last Pilot E-Logbook You'll Ever Need!
Tens of thousands of pilots, from student pilots through senior captains, have come to make Safelog the world's most trusted e-logbook system. Access and update your pilot logbook on PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone, Android, and Web. Totals, currency, graphs, instant IACRA, signatures, photos, printouts, and more — all synchronizing seamlessly — mean your logbook is futureproof, safe, and always available. No-cost transition service for users of other e-logbook systems available. Get started now at or today!

Before beginning a flight, the PIC must become familiar with all available information concerning that flight. Tall order that, but, honestly, you'll be closer to fulfilling the FAR 91.103 mandate after you ace this quiz.

Click here to take the quiz.

Sponsor Announcement
Able Flight || Changing Lives Through the Power of Flight
Changing Lives with the Power of Aviation
Able Flight makes it possible for people with disabilities and wounded veterans to become pilots or have a career in aviation. We don't offer rides or introductory flights. We make pilots! With over 40 licensed pilots to date and more to come very soon, Able Flight is the only non-profit of its kind in the United States. Support the scholarship fund with your tax deductible donation at

Our best stories start with you. If you've heard something the flying world might want to know about, tell us. Submit news tips via e-mail here. (Or send them direct to Newstips at

Sponsor Announcement
Subscribe to 'Kitplanes' Magazine
With Kitplanes, You're Cleared for Take-Off Into the World of Homebuilt Aircraft!
Giving you the facts and figures you need to compare kits and plans to find the project that best meets your requirements (and budget!), Kitplanes shows you what it's like to build and fly today's most innovative and affordable homebuilts! And when you subscribe now, you'll receive The Annual Homebuilt Buyers Guide absolutely free! So get in on the action and discover the one aviation magazine where the sky's the limit – Kitplanes! Click here for details.

With minimal fanfare, composite propellers have been appearing as original equipment on more and more airplanes and more and more owners are finding that they are an option for their airplanes when it comes time for an overhaul or replacement. Composite props are more expensive than their aluminum counterparts, so we were curious why owners are shelling out the extra bucks—what’s the attraction and what’s out there to buy?

First of all, what is a composite prop? At its most basic, it’s a prop that has blades at least partially made of layers of epoxy fiberglass, Kevlar or carbon fiber. The composite material is on top of a core that is either hollow (rare) or made of foam or wood. The base or ferrule of a constant speed prop is usually aluminum or steel and fits into a hub that may be identical to that of a prop with aluminum blades. A fixed pitch composite propeller may have no metal in it at all.


While the conservative certification requirements the FAA developed for composite airframes meant the anticipated major weight savings for composite airplanes never happened, composite materials have proven to greatly reduce the weight of propellers. According to MT-Propeller USA’s Peter Marshall, the weight saving ranges from five to 20 pounds over aluminum, depending on the prop. For the new prop from McCauley, the weight saving is even greater—35 pounds over the aluminum version.

The weight difference, especially as it occurs at one end of the center of gravity envelope, has a number of benefits, beyond simply increasing useful load—although that by itself is a big deal, especially in Light Sport applications.

Reduced weight of the prop means less gyroscopic and flywheel effect which, to a point, is beneficial for wear and tear on the engine, particularly the crankshaft and engine mounts. All things being equal, a lighter prop means longer engine life. It is especially valuable for airplanes flown regularly for aerobatics—and we’ve  observed that many serious akro pilots have switched to composite props.

Composites allow more subtle and precise shaping of a propeller blade than can be accomplished with aluminum. There are limits to what can be done with an aluminum forging. The result is the ability to get more performance out of the prop, which results in more performance for the airplane. While we are always skeptical of speed increase claims, we have gotten reports of cruise speed improvements upon switching to a composite prop. The most remarkable we’ve heard is some eight knots for the Diamond DA-20 with an MT prop.

Hartzell took advantage of the weight savings and ability to fine-tune the shape of a propeller blade with its very wide chord Claw aerobatic props that provide significant additional thrust at low airspeed. The Claw is used by all of the Red Bull racers.


To prevent blade erosion, composite props have some sort of leading edge protection, usually made of steel or nickel. Nicks and dings to the composite material are repaired according to the manufacturer’s guidelines—as with aluminum blades, some damage can be field repaired, some has to be repaired in a prop shop and some is so bad the blade cannot be repaired. For field-repairable damage of a composite prop, the usual procedure is to apply an appropriate epoxy to bring the prop back to its original size and shape.

Because composite blades are never filed down in the process of repairing damage, as are metal blades, composite prop blade life is essentially infinite. Hartzell’s V.P. of sales and product support, Gary Chafin, told us that some turboprop airliners using Hartzell props have blades that have more than 50,000 hours in service.

TBO of a composite prop is comparable to metal props, however, the owner of a composite prop is never going to get the call from the prop shop telling her that the blades have been filed enough that they are undersized and have to be replaced.

Hartzell’s Chafin said that composite props are proving especially valuable in operations where the aircraft has a high utilization rate and repairs for nicks and dings can be handled at out stations when the aircraft is parked during the night, such as on commuter airlines and in bush operations.

Overhaul of a composite prop is similar to that of a constant-speed metal prop.

A side benefit of some MT composite propellers is that in the event of a prop strike, the blade may simply break off and not damage the engine (although a teardown is usually required).

Hartzell’s Chafin told us that a composite prop can be thought of as a tuning fork. By changing the diameter of the threads of the composite material, and the direction of the weave, the natural frequency of the propeller can be adjusted to the most desirable area for the engine-propeller combination. That has the effect of increasing the life of the engine. In addition, the wood or foam core of the blade absorbs some vibration.

More Blades

Another benefit of the weight saving of composite blades is that an additional blade or two can be added without exceeding the weight of the original, metal propeller. In addition to just plain looking cool, if designed correctly, more blades can provide multiple benefits: better performance, reduced vibration, reduced noise and greater ground clearance.

About 20 years ago, as the popularity of three-blade metal propellers to replace factory original two-blade propellers grew, we at Aviation Consumer surveyed owners regarding the phenomenon. We reported on it twice, more recently in the August 2005 issue. Our overall conclusion was that most owners bought three-blade propellers because more blades were more attractive than fewer. While many reported better initial acceleration and climb as well as less vibration, most said that cruise speed was either the same or they had lost a few knots versus the two-blade prop on the airplane previously. By and large, however, performance didn’t matter—esthetics did.

Performance did matter to prop manufacturers and they found that a scimitar shape—sweeping the blades—fixed the cruise speed problem. With the ability to precisely shape the airfoil and allow some fairly radical blade sweep, we have not heard reports of cruise speed loss when owners switch to composite props with an additional blade. To the contrary, it appears that the more precisely molded, multiple-blade composite props are able to convert more of the engine’s power to thrust, improving all areas of performance while looking very good. 

As the engine’s power pulses are spread over more blades, adding a blade reduces the momentary loads on the airframe, a benefit for airframe life.


Hartzell marketed its first composite propeller in 1978 for the CASA 212—it was constructed using a prepreg layup system. This was the first of what it now calls its legacy composite props, which are still in production. A metal shank is bonded into a foam core. The core is covered with a hand laid up prepreg material (originally Kevlar, now carbon fiber) and then the assembly is put into a press. Following the curing process, there are a number of operations, including bonding on a nickel erosion shield.

This creates what Gary Chafin referred to as a structural composite—a semi-monocoque, stressed shell structure.

In 2006, Hartzell developed its Advance Structural Composite (ASC) II propeller for the Cirrus SR22T. It uses a dry carbon fiber lay up, rather than prepreg. A sock is pulled over the foam core and a vacuum-assisted resin transfer process pulls the resin through the dry fibers in the mold. It also allows molding in the items that must be added post cure in the legacy props.

Once an ASC II propeller comes out of the mold, all that remains to be done is remove the flashing and add the finish coatings—cutting production time and cost substantially.

Chafin said that Hartzell originally developed its composite props for the airline industry because it could afford the development costs and badly needed propellers that could be repaired at out stations after suffering the kind of damage that routinely occurs in high-usage operations, such as being bumped by a baggage cart.

Composite technology combined with a nickel erosion shield—according to Chafin, it’s five times stronger than steel—meant that blade life is almost infinite.

The use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has allowed Hartzell to optimize prop shape, notably at the inboard end, to get more boost from its props and performance from the airplanes on which they are installed.

Hartzell composite props are available for a wide range of piston- and turbine-powered airplanes—check with Hartzell to see if one is available for your airplane. Also, contact Hartzell to get specific pricing for its composite props.

Chafin said that Hartzell has ramped up its certification of composite propellers, doubling the number each of the last few years. In the future it will be developing more props for Rotax engines as well as geared diesels.


MT-Propeller builds natural composite propellers. They are not structural composite propellers like Hartzell and McCauley, but highly compressed, layered, laminated beech and spruce wood reinforced with layers of epoxy fiberglass, Kevlar or carbon fiber and sealed with acrylic-polyurethane paint. An aluminum blade ferrule is attached to the wooden blade root with lag screws. The leading edge has erosion strips of either nickel or steel outboard and a self-adhesive PU strip inboard.

The composite covering of the wood allows precise shaping of the airfoil to maximize performance. Overall, MT props weigh from five to 20 pounds less than comparable aluminum props.

Originally building their lightweight props for aerobatic airplanes, MT almost immediately expanded into turboprops and then into piston airplanes—it now makes composite propellers for a substantial portion of the general aviation fleet, including those that use fixed-pitch props as well as a number of vintage airplanes, such as the Boeing Stearman. As we were researching this article, it seemed as if the STC list on MT-Propeller’s website added an airplane every few weeks.

As with other composite props, MT blades have no life limit and are field repairable in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidance.

We noted that MT has aggressively gone the route of adding a blade to its props—where the aluminum factory original airplane had two blades, MT offers a three-blade; where the original was a three-blade, MT offers a four-blade replacement.

For pricing, it’s necessary to contact MT-Propeller USA. 


Shortly after the Cessna Skycatcher came out, McCauley developed and received ASTM approval for a composite prop that weighed about half what the aluminum propeller did.

In April of this year, it received FAA certification under Part 35 for its first composite propeller targeted at Part 23 (and CAR 3) piston-engine airplanes of up to 350 horsepower. With three blades and weighing a whopping 35 pounds less than its aluminum competition (only 45 pounds installed), the McCauley Black Mac Carbon prop is the lightest of the composite propellers in its class.

McCauley Propeller Systems business leader Scott Howell told us that it is in the “tail end” of the process of receiving STCs for a number of high-performance, single-engine airplanes, including the Cirrus SR-22.

The propeller is a structural composite, with an engineered plastic shank (think roller skate wheel material) with a patented retention system that is a continuous carbon loop around a stainless steel ring. A high-density foam core is covered with carbon fiber making a semi-monocoque structure. There is a full-length nickel leading edge erosion strip that is field replaceable. It uses the standard, oil-filled, single-piece McCauley hub. Overhaul interval is 2400 hours or six years. The propeller is flanged for Continental engines, but Howell told us that they anticipate developing a version for Lycoming engines as well.

Over the next few months we expect to see McCauley identifying the airplanes on which the prop has been approved for installation.


We think the benefits of a composite propeller upgrade are convincing enough to justify the sizable price premium over traditional props—especially if you plan to keep the aircraft for a long time. These benefits include reduced weight and vibration, better noise reduction, longer service life and decent ramp appeal.

Rick Durden holds an ATP with Douglas DC-3 and Cessna Citation type ratings and is the author of The Thinking Pilot’s Flight Manual or, How to Survive Flying Little Airplanes and Have a Ball Doing It, Vols. 1 & 2.

This article originally appeared in the July 2015 issue of Aviation Consumer magazine.

For more great content like this, subscribe to Aviation Consumer!

Forward this email to a friend
Tailor your alerts!
Click here to update alerts preferences.
AVweb Insider <="229272">

When I first saw the story yesterday in the Mercury News, that a jet had to execute a go-around at SFO after lining up on the taxiway instead of the runway, my first reaction was that the “disaster averted!” angle was overwrought. Really? I thought. Just like every day, when I tap the brakes to stop at a red light, I guess that’s a disaster averted, too. After all, if I didn’t stop, carnage would likely ensue. Sure, a mistake was made by the A320 crew, but mistakes are always made, and that’s why there are checks in place, to be sure those mistakes don’t turn into smoking holes. Those checks worked, at SFO, just as they should have, and all went on as usual. No story here.

But then I listened to the audio (you can listen to it here, courtesy of and my heart skipped a beat. An A320 crew member called ATC to ask about the “lights on the runway.” The controller calls back that he’s “confirmed, clear to land,” and says “There’s no one on 28 Right but you.” OK, says the pilot, then a new voice chimes in. “Where’s this guy goin’? He’s on the taxiway.” As far as I know, that voice hasn’t been identified, except as maybe another pilot on the frequency. But in this case he might be labeled as the voice of reason, the clear light of reality, the last chance of averting disaster. “Go around,” ATC pipes in, and the crew goes around, all is well, nothing bad happened.

So how close a call was it? Would the crew have figured it out in time to react? It was almost midnight — pitch dark. It’s not clear exactly how high the A320 was when they made the call to ATC, but they were on final approach. It’s also not clear exactly what they were doing in the cockpit or how they got lined up wrong in the first place. If that voice hadn’t piped in … would ATC have figured it out in time to warn the A320 crew? It seems inevitable the crew would have figured it out shortly — but would they have figured it out in time to pull up and go around safely? An A320 scrolling down final has an awful lot of momentum. We’re lucky that we can sit around today and ask these questions, and not have to be thinking about all that wreckage at SFO.

DC One-X from David Clark - lightest full-featured ANR headset

Gear-up landings aren't an everyday event, but they're hardly rare, either. In today's video, Paul Bertorelli examines why they happen, what the outcomes are and how you can avoid one if you fly a retrac. Putting the wheels down is a big help...

Picture of the Week <="229263">
Picture of the Week

What a great trip. A bunch of Taylorcraft owners go together for a 3200 mile trip through the West and Mark Bowden shot this at Marble Canyon (L41). Nice picture, Mark and it looks like a great time.


Heard recently on the CTAF frequency at Arlington Municipal Airport (KAWO) in Washington:

Cessna 123: “Departing 34, straight out to the west."

Eric Taylor



AVweb is the world's premier independent aviation news resource, online since 1995. Our reporting, features, and newsletters are brought to you by:

Tom Bliss

Editorial Director, Aviation Publications
Paul Bertorelli

Russ Niles

Contributing Editors
Mary Grady
Geoff Rapoport

Rick Durden
Kevin Lane-Cummings
Paul Berge
Larry Anglisano

Ad Coordinator
Karen Lund

Click here to send a letter to the editor. (Please let us know if your letter is not intended for publication.)

Comments or questions about the news should be sent here.

Have a product or service to advertise on AVweb? Your advertising can reach over 225,000 loyal AVwebFlash, AVwebBiz, and AVweb web site readers every week. Over 80% of our readers are active pilots and aircraft owners. That's why our advertisers grow with us, year after year. For ad rates and scheduling, click here or contact Tom Bliss: