Forward This E-mail | Edit Email Preferences | Advertise | Contact | Privacy | Help

  • Text size:

    • A
    • A
    • A

Fargo, North Dakota-based Appareo announced that it earned FAA TSO authorization for its panel-mounted Stratus ADS-B transponder. Starting at $2995, the 1090ES ADS-B Out transponder—which has an integrated GPS WAAS receiver— is available in two kits. The Stratus ESG has a mandate-compliant ADS-B transmitter, while the $3495 Stratus ESGi kit also includes a non-certified ADS-B In receiver. 

When connected with the ESG transponder, the Stratus 2i ADS-B receiver can interface with the ForeFlight tablet app, providing both ADS-B and AHRS data. The receiver is only compatible with the Stratus transponder, however, and can't be used with other ADS-B systems.

Appareo's ESG 1090ES ADS-B solution is targeted at federated panels (with a mix of brands) that might not have a mandate-approved WAAS GPS. Additionally, Appareo says the ESG comes with mostly everything a shop will need to complete a mandate-compliant retrofit, including a WAAS GPS antenna—no hidden costs.

The ESG is also designed to interface with the popular Stratus 1S and Stratus 2-series portable ADS-B receivers, piggybacking with the transponder for receiving power and its GPS signal. This means the Stratus receiver can be remotely mounted, rather than placed on the glareshield.

Compared to some other ADS-B transponders, the ESG has a more utilitarian feature set, including an LED display, push-button squawk code entry and an automatic VFR button. 

In development for several years, the now-certified ESG is among a wide variety of 1090ES transponder solutions, in addition to plenty of 978 UAT remote mounted ADS-B solutions. Appareo says the transponders will be available through its network of 280 approved sales and installation dealerships.

For more information, visit

Sponsor Announcement
NIC3 Cylinders || Corrosion Protection - Extended Cylinder Life - Available Now

European regulators have long restricted the use of single-engine turbine and turboprop airplanes for commercial operations at night or in instrument meteorological conditions, but that’s about to change. After 20 years of work and negotiations between industry and government agencies, a key EASA committee has voted to approve a new regulatory framework that will allow those operations. “This new regulation will help expand the market for passenger transport to underserved markets and improve overnight cargo delivery not only in central Europe, but in the remote regions of the continent as well,” said Jens Hennig, GAMA’s vice president of operations.

These operations already are quite common around the world and are based on ICAO standards issued in 2005, GAMA said. The new regulation now must complete a final round of scrutiny by the EU institutions before its official publication, after which it can take effect. It’s expected that process will take about six months. The new rule will be “a welcome development for manufacturers, operators, and service providers,” Hennig said.

Sponsor Announcement
AEA Pilots Guide to Avionics 2016-17 Edition || Aircraft Electronics Association
Request Your 2016-17 Pilot's Guide to Avionics
The 2016-17 edition of the Aircraft Electronics Association's Pilot's Guide to Avionics is now available. The publication is a consumer's directory loaded with educational articles about the avionics industry, its products, and its people, which helps pilots and aircraft owners make better buying decisions and locate nearly 1,300 AEA member companies, including government-certified repair stations around the world. To request a complimentary copy, visit

image: KFDM News

The pilot of a skydiving plane faced a challenging situation after his engine died shortly after takeoff on Sunday, with a crowded Texas beach below. “I saw a truck, tent, people, a truck, tent, people… I’m like, oh gosh, we’re going to kill somebody,” passenger Robert Bertrand told the local KFDM news. The Cessna 206 was at 3,500 feet with the pilot and four passengers on board when the engine quit and oil splattered the windscreen, Bertrand said. The pilot was able to avoid all of the activity on the ground and put the airplane down safely on an empty stretch of Crystal Beach, near Galveston. Nobody was hurt, and the airplane was towed away the next day.

News reports didn’t identify the pilot, but Bertrand, who had signed up for the flight to celebrate a birthday, said he saved everyone on board, plus everyone on the beach. “This is a 50th I’ll never forget,” he said.

Sponsor Announcement
Over 24,000 Happy GAMIjectors® Customers Can't Be Wrong!
GAMIjectors® have given these aircraft owners reduced cylinder head temperatures, reduced fuel consumption, and smoother engine operation. GAMIjectors® alter the fuel/air ratio in each cylinder so that each cylinder operates with a much more uniform fuel/air ratio than occurs with any other factory set of injectors. To speak to a GAMI engineer, call (888) FLY-GAMI, or go online for complete engineering details.

Senate file photo

A Harmon Rocket flown by Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., ran off the runway after landing in Ketchum, Oklahoma, about 7 p.m. Sunday night, ABC News reported this morning. ABC said a spokesperson for the senator confirmed that Inhofe was flying the airplane, and that he had told the FAA he veered into the brush to avoid a deer on the runway. The 81-year-old senator and another local pilot had been out flying, each in their own airplane, when severe weather prompted the unscheduled landing, according to ABC. Senator Inhofe was alone in the airplane and nobody was hurt. The FAA is investigating the incident. The aerobatic Harmon Rocket taildragger is a modified Van’s sport plane.

Senator Inhofe has logged more than 11,000 hours, according to his website, and is well-known in the aviation community as an advocate for aviation legislation, including third-class-medical reform. The FAA required him to take “remedial training” after an incident in 2010 when he landed on a closed runway in his Cessna 340, narrowly missing several parked vehicles. Nobody was hurt.

Sponsor Announcement
Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance || Available at
Human Factors for A&Ps
A unique book focusing on human factors in the MRO or line maintenance environment but applicable to any team-building situation where the actions of one affect the results and performance of others. Covered in depth are physiological, psychological, and communications factors which affect individual and team performance, thus helping to reduce workplace errors and injuries and ultimately increasing the safety and productivity of the industry. Meets all FAA, ICAO, and EASA standards.
Human Factors: AMT Certification Series
book $ 32.95
e-book $ 29.95
book/e-book bundle $ 39.95

For more information, call (970) 726-5111 or click here.

Our best stories start with you. If you've heard something the flying world might want to know about, tell us. Submit news tips via e-mail here. (Or send them direct to Newstips at

Sponsor Announcement
Subscribe to 'IFR' Magazine and Test Your Skills
Ready for a Challenge? Test Your Skills with IFR!
Guaranteed important reading for every instrument-rated (or soon to be rated) pilot, IFR speaks your language, understands your concerns, and shares your excitement for flying. It's the only no-holds-barred resource for pilots who have earned their instrument ratings. So get the one magazine written by, and for, instrument-rated pilots — IFR! Click here for details.

AVweb is the world's premier independent aviation news resource, online since 1995. Our reporting, features, and newsletters are brought to you by:

Tom Bliss

Editorial Director, Aviation Publications
Paul Bertorelli

Russ Niles

Scott Simmons

Contributing Editors
Mary Grady
Elaine Kauh

Rick Durden
Kevin Lane-Cummings
Paul Berge
Larry Anglisano

Ad Coordinator
Karen Lund

Click here to send a letter to the editor. (Please let us know if your letter is not intended for publication.)

Comments or questions about the news should be sent here.

Have a product or service to advertise on AVweb? Your advertising can reach over 225,000 loyal AVwebFlash, AVwebBiz, and AVweb web site readers every week. Over 80% of our readers are active pilots and aircraft owners. That's why our advertisers grow with us, year after year. For ad rates and scheduling, click here or contact Tom Bliss:

Forward this email to a friend
Tailor your alerts!
Click here to update alerts preferences.
AVweb Insider <="226512">

That we live in interesting times is made ever more evident by an email I got from reader Matthew Sawhill following last week’s fatal crash of a Tesla Model S being operated on the car’s much-touted autopilot feature. Conceding that cars aren’t airplanes, Sawhill asked: “Why can't the auto industry and mass media learn from (and set expectations based on) 70 years of experience with autopilot technology in aviation?”

It’s a fair question and illuminates a trend that seems ever more obvious to me: Automation and autonomy are steadily blurring the lines between not just transportation modes, but everything in modern life. In transportation, it may matter less if it’s a car, an airplane, a bus, a boat or a train than it does that it gets from A to B largely without human intervention. To think that we’re not going there—and probably sooner than many admit—is to occupy the last besieged island of delusional Luddites.

Consider the question, though. What could automakers learn from the aviation experience? First, that no matter how clever, cautious and foresightful they are, they’ll get things wrong and (a) the machine will malfunction, (b) homo the sap will figure out a way to defeat what multiple layers of safety interlocks the smart kids have provided, (c) the human-machine interface will create errors and (d) people will die as a result. How many billions of pixels have we devoted to the benefits of aircraft automation being a delicate balance against the human’s mental acuity and hand-eye coordination atrophying to the point of uselessness? Full automation will likely eliminate that and perhaps reduce fatalities markedly, but it will introduce new faults no one thought of.

The Tesla crash is an example of this. In case you weren’t paying attention, the Tesla was on autopilot clipping down a divided four-lane, non-limited-access highway. A tractor trailer made a left-hand turn in front of the car, crossing one of the many cutovers this type of highway typically has. The driver was enough out of the loop not to have noticed and the sedan went under the trailer, killing him. The driver was an aficionado of the Tesla in general and of its autopilot features specifically and had posted several videos like this one touting the system's capabilities.

If he understood that Tesla had plainly said this technology is not intended to be hands-off/eyes-off autonomy, it seems reasonable to conclude that he didn’t act on this understanding. (News reports claimed he may have been watching a DVD, but that’s almost a distractor to the larger issue of believing the Tesla system has more capability than it does.)

One thing automotive manufacturers will not be able to do is build systems as relatively simple as aircraft autopilots are. You read that right. That’s because autonomous driving is a far more complex problem than autonomous flying. The proximities are much closer, there are many more vehicles and many more variables in the form of road standards, obstacles, weather effects, mixing with non-autonomous vehicles and sheer human unpredictability and there are no enforced separation standards, as we have in aviation. We may reach this kind of chaos in aviation if drones achieve the swarming level, which some think they will. But we're not there yet.

While airplanes have the additional challenge of the third dimension, this turns out to be an advantage: Cars can’t do vertical separation, or at least in a way that will render them useful after cheating the collision. Fully autonomous aircraft autopilots aren’t in their infancy. GPS, INS, GPWS, TAWs, autothrottles, smart servos and other technologies have been around for quite some time and we know how to use them. As we reported, Diamond recently demonstrated a fully autonomous flight of one of its twins and as soon as they work out the details of electric braking, the airplanes will be capable of chock-to-chock flights with little or no human intervention. It then becomes simply a matter of filling in the regulatory boxes and seeing if anyone wants to buy such a thing. (Some certainly will.)

Against the backdrop of that and, say, a 777 being capable of routine autolandings, consider the Tesla’s challenge. Rather than the relatively trivial task of tracking an electronic glideslope—which we’ve been doing for 50 years—and judging closure rate with radar altimetry to a flat, obstacle-free, internationally approved strip of concrete, the Tesla uses a combination of cameras, ultrasonic sensors and short-range radar to detect and avoid obstacles in a highly non-standard environment. News reports indicated that the ambient light was such that the camera couldn’t distinguish the light truck body from a light background. (The human eye, of course, probably could have.) Elon Musk was quoted as saying the forward-looking radar is programmed to recognize and not react to overpasses and may have interpreted the truck as just that.

There’s another thing the automation can’t do that the driver could have, had he been engaged: exercise intuition. The accident scenario was a classic left-turn threat that motorcyclists know all about. If you’re paying attention, you see the potential many seconds before it has time to develop; you analyze it and respond by slowing or maneuvering. It’s an OODA loop. A car autopilot can probably be taught to do some form of this, but will it ever be able to distinguish a parked vehicle from one that’s about to dart across a lane just by the look of it? Maybe. But it will be a while.

There are dozens of such scenarios. Another one is at an intersection near my house. It’s a complex intersection with momentary restricted right on red, conveyed through a sign with an arrow that illuminates for just 10 seconds of the turn cycle. Could a Tesla autopilot deal with this? Whether it can or it can’t is less relevant than realizing an airplane doesn’t have to. Even if it auto taxis to the ramp, it can already do that via WAAS-GPS. A few optical sensors might improve the process.

That a Tesla owner would dismiss the risk of running on full autopilot while snoozing is perhaps understandable, given how well the system apparently functions and that there’s a complete lack of risk data on Tesla autopilot accidents because this is the first one. According to the National Safety Council, the fatal accident rate in the U.S. is 1.08/100 million miles driven. If Tesla’s data is correct, the Florida accident was the first fatal in 130 million miles of autopilot operation. A single data point does not a risk matrix make, but at least the autopilot can claim a slightly better record.

What all this means, I think, is that automakers can expect unexpected fatalities with automation as a factor just as airplane manufacturers have experienced. It’s just inevitable. And while the bright new world of autonomy may eventually drive fatalities dramatically downward, I doubt if anyone reading this will see the end of them in his or her lifetime. The immediate lesson for drivers of semi-autonomous cars is this: Stay in the loop, with eyes on the road, or risk making the last bad judgment of your life.

Legendary Ram Overhauled Engine Sale || $2,000 Loyalty Reward and $2,000 In-Stock Discount || (254) 752-8381

The L-3 ESI-500 Genesis retrofit flight display has synthetic vision, can display GPS and ILS data, has an integral backup battery and has an AML-STC for retrofit in a wide variety of aircraft. In this video, Aviation Consumer magazine Editor Larry Anglisano takes a close look at the instrument with L-3's Todd Scholten in a Beech Baron.

New DC One-X from David Clark || Advanced Comfort Technology and Superior Performance
Picture of the Week <="226499">
Picture of the Week

Dustin Mosher of Tehachapi, CA turns up the contrast in our latest "PotW" selection — showing off two very different airplanes. (Or maybe they're not so different, after all.) Click through for more photos from AVweb readers.

What Everybody Ought to Know About the CGR-30P from Electronics International

The Brainteaser #220 Bonus Question asked readers to name their favorite airshow performers or performances. The results are in, and no one appearing on the upcoming November ballot made the cut here. (This is an audio recording of the People's Choice Award article.)

Aviation Headset Survey || Click Here to Win Pilot Gear!

Heard anything funny, unusual, or downright shocking on the radio lately? If you've been flying any length of time, you're sure to have eavesdropped on a few memorable exchanges. The ones that gave you a chuckle may do the same for your fellow AVweb readers. Share your radio funny with us, and, if we use it in a future "Short Final," we'll send you a sharp-looking AVweb hat to sport around your local airport. No joke.

Click here to submit your original, true, and previously unpublished story.