Question of the Week: Regulating the Hudson VFR Corridor
Saturday’s deadly midair collision over the Hudson River has spurred calls for closing the VFR corridor or at least tightening up on regulations. We’d like to hear what you think. Plus: Last week, GAMA released some sobering numbers about aircraft orders (and cancellations) for the current year. In response, we asked AVweb readers to predict when we might see the bottom of the current downturn for aviation. Click through to see how they answered last week’s Question.
PREVIOUS RESULTS ***
Last week, GAMA released some sobering numbers about aircraft orders (and cancellations) for the current year. In response, we asked AVweb readers to predict when we might see the bottom of the current downturn for aviation.
Reader responses ran the gamut of possible choices. The most popular answer (by a hair) was that it could be several years before the aviation industry levels out or begins to improve. Following close behind was the choice There's still some pain coming, but the light in the tunnel isn't a train (anymore). A scant 16 AVweb readers thought the improvement had already begun.
For a complete (real-time) breakdown of reader responses, click here.
(You may be asked to register and answer if you haven't already participated in this poll.)
THIS WEEK'S QUESTION ***
Saturday's deadly midair collision over the Hudson River has spurred calls for closing the VFR corridor or at least tightening up on regulations. We'd like to hear what you think.
Should the Hudson River Corridor be more tightly regulated?
(click to answer)
Have an idea for a new "Question of the Week"? Send your suggestions to .
NOTE:
This address is only for suggested "QOTW" questions, and not for "QOTW" answers or comments.
Use this form to send "QOTW" comments to our AVmail Editor.
