To Dream The Irrational Dreams

22

Aviation’s Owning v. Renting debate is a rite of spring, best enjoyed while listening to Stravinsky on your Sixty-Eight Firebird’s 8-track in the FBO parking lot as you consider whether to buy a Cirrus (sweet) or rent a Cessna (dependable). Tough decision, but perhaps a sprig of fractured Hamlet will clarify the choice: “To be or not to be an airplane owner. Whether ‘tis nobler to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortunes showered on insurance, maintenance, and hangars, or eschew the thousand unnatural shocks that ownership is heir to and give pause to mask the true costs by renting from the FBO who is painfully aware of reality?” That is the question, which will never be answered, but let’s throw down the gauntlet to see who retrieves it.

Over the past 45 years I’ve owned 6.2 airplanes, which is one airplane every 87 months. Included in the madness: Bonanza, Stitts, Cherokee, Marquart, TriPacer (no snickering; damn fine airplane), Citabria, and Champ. The Tripe had five partners sharing ownership duties, meaning one guy did all the work, allowing the rest of us to fly and complain when something broke. As sole owner of the Citabria and Champ, I assume all costs and despite my experience, I have—yet again—managed to schedule both to be down for simultaneous annual inspections. You’d think I’d learn, but I don’t and likely never will. When asked why I own two airplanes, I reply with a straight face (not easy when you have Bell’s Palsy, as I do), “One needs a second airplane in order to retrieve parts for the other.”

There’s nothing rational about flight, but once we accept that premise—and I wholeheartedly do—then embracing the many lunacies that accompany an unfettered passion becomes routine. Love has that power. For instance, I recently spent $13,000 on my Champ’s annual inspection. I realize Cessna 210 owners shrug at such a low bill, but that’s more than double what I paid for the airplane in 1982. Granted, inflation deflates my indignation, and included in the $13K are four new Millennium cylinders that so far are performing well. Curiously, when you rebuild a vintage engine, even using new parts, performance enhancement is negligible. It’s still a 65-HP Champ, practically perfect in every way, provided I keep replacing parts, which lances a long festering aviation boil.

I can’t list all the STC’d gewgaws I’ve installed in my airplanes that came with explicit or implicit claims of being direct replacements for original equipment. Just pop out the old, slide in the new, season to taste, and you’re back in the saddle before the mechanic can say, “Um, this doesn’t fit ….” Consider two recent examples.

The new Millennium cylinders look great, work fine and are legitimate replacements for the original Continental 65s, which are difficult to find and more challenging to find shops willing to hone new life into worn out jugs. Millenniums are STC’d as direct replacements. Except, as we discovered during installation, the heads are slightly larger than the originals, requiring modifications to the baffling and lower cowling. Cut, snip, file, patch, grumble, repeat, until the new cylinders directly replaced the old. Billable time consuming but doable. The Champ has returned to service, and everyone’s happy, especially the mechanic who gets to roll that juicy 210 into the shop.

Meanwhile, the parallel universe Citabria maintenance got a little out of hand. At the completion of previous budget-defying annuals I’ve muttered to amused mechanics, “At least next year it won’t be this extensive or expensive.” That’s rarely the case. The 7ECA Citabria has been eating up rubber engine mount bushings since I bought it five years ago. American Champion Aircraft (ACA) provides good tech support and suggested I buy a new, beefier conical engine mount. Not too expensive but, unfortunately, not in stock so “give us four weeks to fabricate one in any color so long as its black.”  Into the third week of waiting, but hope and rationalization spring eternal, and with luck I’ll fly before spring 2023.

After placing the order, I felt giddy with fantasies of flight behind an engine that wouldn’t lose its grip, when the law of unintended consequences poked its beak into my euphoric bubble. Every action in aircraft ownership causes an equal and unforeseen reaction. After ordering the new hardware, we realized that the additional curved tubing that gives the mount its beef also blocks engine baffling vent tubes, there to cool the magnetos. ACA tech support anticipated my follow-up call and added appropriately modified baffling to the order.

During the downtime, we decided to replace the incandescent position light in the rudder with a new Whelen LED position light and strobe combo that I inferred was a direct replacement for the old fixture. Simply unfasten two rusty screws, remove the current unit, reconnect the forty-year-old wires, and slide in the direct replacement, which … didn’t come close to fitting. No problem, Aircraft Spruce is excellent about returns, and within days I had a smaller, TSO’d AeroLEDs SunTail that resembles the backup light on a Fifty-Six Mercury. It fits the aperture, and after hours of rewiring, directly replaced the old. So, while I await ACA’s mas macho engine mount, which I’m certain will slide into place without any adjustments, I can flash the Fifties-retro tail strobe at hangar wags who taunt, “An annual inspection is intended to be performed every year, not all year.” Let them laugh. I’ll sleep, perchance to dream of sunset flights with my new strobe blinding those who dare get on my six, firing salvos of unwelcome reality.

Aviation has always required blending lofty expectations with bucketsful of unknowns tossed into the slurry. I offer no insight to the Owning v. Renting discussion because rationalizing ownership is a fool’s errand, but here’s the rub. No bigger fool than I will repeatedly take up that gauntlet and fly with dogged optimism into the sunlit uplands of delusion. See you up there.

Other AVwebflash Articles

22 COMMENTS

  1. Aviation truths.. and written with such literary flair leavened with a generous dash of humor! Bravo — thanks Paul!

  2. WHY in heavens name do you own BOTH a 7ECA and a 7AC 65 Champ? Do you need to borrow one of my hammers to hit yourself over the head? It’d be a lot cheaper, I’d think?

  3. Wonderful, Paul. I know of only two great aviation writers who can skilfully weave the Bard into their writing – and you are one of them! (The other is Peter Garrison). Bless you for giving us all a reason to smile this morning – and to wince a little at the truth of it! 🙂

  4. From a life time of being an Aeronca owner and lover, I also too say yes to the lowly TriPacer. Once had a 135HP Tri Pacer. For several years flew the heck out of it, late ’60s, early ’70s. Even slowly trudged from L.A. to Memphis and back one time. Once I got the full hang of that flying machine, I never felt more comfortable in flying an airplane.

  5. I am one of those 20-25 hour a year pilots. No way would I even consider ownership. The AOPA did a study years ago. Said that if one doesn’t fly at least 70 hours a year, said person should not be owning an airplane. I totally agree with that finding

    • AOPA lives in a fantasy world where a $115,000 C-152 is a deal and putting $80,000 worth of avionics in a $35,000 airplane makes perfect sense. Though AOPA does do good in DC and puts out a great magazine they have for the most part abandoned the guys with the lower cost planes. EAA has definitely done more for the average owner in the past decade then AOPA. Both are valuable and I belong to both.

    • Also remember most of us cannot justify owning a plane. I have an F35 Bonanza I fly 70 hours per year. Renting would be north of $17,500 a year. I spend about $16,000 in a good year, more in a bad year. But the emotional satisfaction which you cannot put a value on has a lot to do with it and that is why I own.

  6. Dump the certified and go back to experimental, orders of magnitude cheaper. I have an Experimental and a couple ultralights, the only way ownership is feasible for me. Would love to have bought your Marquart!

  7. The disappointment that is so common among aviators is quite simple.
    Flying airplanes, and owning airplanes, are two completely unrelated activities.
    Once that simple truth is discovered and embraced, euphoria lurks around every corner.

    • Yup! Flying airplanes and owning airplanes exist as a cruel co-dependence. Every time I go flying I tell myself “Aw hell. I think I’ll keep it”.

  8. as a relatively new pilot (2 years), but not young pilot (65), and a relatively new owner of a Cherokee 6 (1 year), I can concur that renting is definitely cheaper, even at the nearly 100 hours a year i log. However, nothing beats the pride of ownership of your own plane.

    i am though constantly reminded by something my father told me years ago, “Son, if it flies or floats, rent don’t buy.” there was a third F he had in there, but i will leave it out of a family publication.

  9. There arealways the facts that: one, it’s available on short notice when you want it (shop time notwithstanding). Two, you don’t have to have it back at a specific time regardless of weather. And three, you have a better idea of the maintenance history and condition of the plane. (A Cherokee 6 in my case.) Definite advantages if you are willing and able to pay for them.

  10. “To Dream The Irrational Dreams” Yes, but if you want to live them…

    One of the things I would look forward to in my misspent youth growing up in the shadows of Chicago skyscrapers was tuning in to oral historian and interviewer Studs Terkel on WFMT radio whenever I could. Like Paul’s words, Studs verbally captivated my wandering imagination and sent me on marvelous journeys into other peoples’ lives regularly. Coincidentally I’m reading his book/compilation called ‘Hard Times’ presently, and a passage stood out that I think applies to aircraft owners like many of us – or maybe only me…

    ‘During the otherwise bleak years of the 1930s, Terkel relates, there was nonetheless “a camaraderie: the passing of a cigarette butt to another, a streetcar transfer changing hands, a morning newspaper handed over to the next guy…” So much for “hard times”—those were glory days for Terkel and he relished them.’

    A lot like I view aircraft ownership – shared misery and glory with fellow hangar mates, FBO’s and pilots, always working to keep our passion alive no matter if we fly 10 hours or 200 hours a year or just work on them for a year. It’s not logical, somewhat ludicrous, but always stimulating and adventurous. My kind of activity.
    With respect, my guess even Studs would be bored interviewing aircraft renters…

    P.S. And from a comment above, is AOPA in the financial planning business now or just trying to discourage GA full throttle? What absurd advice to give about aircraft ownership if comment is true.

    • Thanks Dave for your prose. Studs Terkel nailed the camaraderie bit. While passing a cigarette around was a regular moral booster during my dubious judgement college days, it’s been decades since I smoked. But during years of airplane ownership, somewhat in the same spirit as “a streetcar transfer changing hands”, tired batteries, ragged headsets, wobbly old tailwheels and not quite but almost totally bald tires have passed between myself and various hangar neighbors. This hangar “passing of a cigarette butt” beat goes on and we’ll all be friends forever “dreaming the irrational dreams”.

      • John – just an anecdote I read once that, when Studs was in his eighties he was jumped and robbed while walking in Chicago. As he was getting to his feet, he asked his assailants if they would give him back enough for bus fare… Ha! I’m surprised he didn’t ask them to sit for an interview…

  11. “Don Quixote once embattled windmills…” and was portrayed as an old, feeble, intelligent madman with the ability to flash into sanity. Yep, the profile of the present aircraft owner. PB, you’ve done nailed it!

LEAVE A REPLY